egwJoined: Feb 01, 2003: 1271Lation: Eastern PAG2 pah files: 6
I think itould work for mus that is slowly evolving and doesn't require real time adjustments or retions._________________gregwaltzerom
I think itould work for mus that is slowly evolving and doesn't require real time adjustments or retions.
I understand the delay line stuff but
would it not beonfusing to others espially sie the number of performers onlineould vary from jam to jam?keep me in the looooooooooop.m
oust InterloperJoined: Jul 07, 2007: 730Lation: Berksounty, PAAudio files: 6
PS: thinking about Rehs Mus as a gradual press may be useful here, or Riley's instrtions for In.Quote:
I think the two major problems
to solve in trying to do this as an experiment are:1. Having a looseanon strture along the lines of In, where wean intertively evolve the realization of the pie, and2. Some software infrastrture to sy playing up at eh node. We don't even need to share aommonlk, as long as our millisonds
are all of the same length. Oe a sond (or whatever time granularity) myomputerollts everybody else's messages and spits out a sound, with whh I play. It doesn't matter if mylk is 40 millisonds off from yourlk, bause you don't hear my sound when itomes out, and I don't hear yours.I don't think we'd want to do MIDI. Open Soundontrolhas an extended mode that supports timestamped bundles. Youan sh a MIDI sequee as a bundle if you like. On ehomputer we'd have to have a server press running that would take an ioming O bundle and release it as a stream of MIDI messages (or similar) at the
preribed time. A lot of mus toolsannot handle O bundles, BUT with ehomputer weould have a press running that essentially unbundles the bundle and "releases" its notes to a MIDIhannel or an no-bundle Ohannel at the appropriate time. Also, when you perform, a "bundler" would do the inverse, bundle up your messages and broaast them out to everybody else's unbundlers.When I had my interview in mah for my new professor job that starts tomorrow, the Provisional Assistant Dean (the Dean was busy) asked me what I saw myself doing in 10 years. My wife says I should have answered, "Drinking shots down at Shorty's!" But, in ft, I talked about this idea, and the more general idea of superpositionalompositional strture. I don't know if it made any sense, but at least I got the job!Got two days of new fulty brainwashing tomorrow and Wednesday, and then 4omputer ieeourses starting Monday for
whh I need to prep some ltures, but I am going to think about this in those long meetings tomorrow, and try to skeh out an ahitture. Somebody elsean think about writing aanon. Make it something wean repeat for a long time, but nondeterminist. maybe we should just play "In"!!! Worldwide distributed In. Wouldn't
that be something?My wife just walked in and gave me that, "Now what are you getting yourself into?" look. Guess I;'d better go sleep and prepare to earn that daily bread. Good night._________________Ordinary Mhinery . . . frightened her . . . It seemed to take up an Absurd Amount of Spe.
